For the 2nd Premier League game running, Arsene Wenger chose to field a Denilson-Song-Fabregas midfield three but unlike the City game last weekend, Arsenal had to make do with playing against the 11 men of West Ham in a fixture that has been quite tight and low-scoring in recent years.
As such, this was the first true test of this new midfield's ability to break down a deep-lying defensive team. A similar system was in place against Partizan with Denilson the deepest midfielder and Song more box-to-box, but on that occasion Jack Wilshere played as the attacking midfielder in place of the injured Cesc Fabregas. Wilshere was of course suspended for this fixture and the one at Eastlands, had he been available it's likely we may not have seen this novel midfield system in place.
With Denilson holding the midfield and Fabregas supporting Chamakh in attack, Song was free to roam in between and contribute to both defence and attack. Much like Yaya Toure, Song is a player valued for his physical and defensive qualities but with the technical ability and intelligence to play higher up the pitch in a more direct and creative role. Potentially he's the best box-to-box player in the squad given his all-round abilities, intelligence and discipline (although Wilshere has also impressed so far this season), but the problem for Arsenal is that he's also by far the best holder. The question is which is better - Song holding/Denilson passing or Denilson holding/Song box-to-box? Wenger has opted for the latter in the last few games they've played together. Song brings added dynamism to the attack compared to Denilson, but at the same time still gets back to form a double defensive shield when the opposition have the ball in Arsenal's own half, so his re-deployment further forward may not necessarily weaken the defence.
Although each of the midfield trio had individual roles, there was considerable interchange with all 3 being comfortable playing deep or closer to the opposition box (Denilson less so). This seems to be a conscious decision by Arsene Wenger in an attempt to find new ways of breaking down the dreaded "parked bus" which has often been the scourge of this possession-based Arsenal side. With players moving out of their natural zones, they can lose their markers, draw players away from team-mates, and arrive un-noticed in dangerous areas. In particular, if the deepest midfielder - who often has no specific marker - is given the license to get into the opposition box, then that adds a whole new attacking dimension to this Arsenal side.
Of course this requires discipline and understanding between the midfielders in order not to leave the defence uncovered, this was painfully apparent against West Brom but on Saturday this didn't seem to be a problem.
As usual, some video evidence to summarise the key features of the new-look midfield:
steve · 751 weeks ago
BackwardsGooner 61p · 751 weeks ago
steven · 751 weeks ago
BackwardsGooner 61p · 751 weeks ago
4-2-3-1 would be a more accurate reflection of the formation ever since Wenger pushed Fabregas up into a more attacking role around this time last season.
aravindvr · 751 weeks ago
Keep up the gud work...a lesson to all Song bashers and the misery brigade,,,
Julian H · 751 weeks ago
Is the future not more about combining players who can play deep AND further forward? For example Khedira and Alonso.
And if so, could we see a midfield three of Lansbury-Wilshere-Ramsey in the near future? All three can tackle, pass sensibly (keeping possession), pass dangerously (ie. through-balls), AND score goals. One of them can also dribble very well (Wilshere), reminding me of Iniesta - although (without wanting to succumb to hype), Wilshere's possibly better from deep than Iniesta (yes, really, there - I said it).
BackwardsGooner 61p · 751 weeks ago
Arsenal Station · 751 weeks ago
Heru · 751 weeks ago
midfield general · 751 weeks ago
Jib · 751 weeks ago
Looking at the other players on the average position chart, I noticed that Arsh is right on top of Cham. I know Cham moves quite a bit, but do you think it is a concern with Arsh being so inward with his lazy tendencies? I wonder how his movement and average position compares to when he first came to the Arsenal?
Domhuaille · 751 weeks ago
BackwardsGooner 61p · 751 weeks ago
@thersd · 751 weeks ago
Kirt · 750 weeks ago
http://www.americantreble.com/2010/11/alex-song-a...
BackwardsGooner 61p · 750 weeks ago
I disagree in your piece about Arsenal switching from a double to single pivot this season. Last season Song anchored mostly by himself, but then at the start of this season we saw a new system with Song and Wilshere forming a double screen in front of the back 4 when defending (Wilshere pushing on when attacking). However in the last couple of games the defensive double pivot seems to have been replaced with a single holding midfielder and Song as a more full-time box to box player.
But other than that agree with the rest of the points you made.
Sharafat1111 82p · 530 weeks ago
He was my favorite author growing up, and he touted he kept refusing hollywood scripts because they tried to cast the kids as teenagers. Well, he accepted one, and they cast the kids as teenagers.