Monday, 1 November 2010

Arsenal 1-0 West Ham: Analysis of Arsene's new-look midfield

For the 2nd Premier League game running, Arsene Wenger chose to field a Denilson-Song-Fabregas midfield three but unlike the City game last weekend, Arsenal had to make do with playing against the 11 men of West Ham in a fixture that has been quite tight and low-scoring in recent years.

As such, this was the first true test of this new midfield's ability to break down a deep-lying defensive team. A similar system was in place against Partizan with Denilson the deepest midfielder and Song more box-to-box, but on that occasion Jack Wilshere played as the attacking midfielder in place of the injured Cesc Fabregas. Wilshere was of course suspended for this fixture and the one at Eastlands, had he been available it's likely we may not have seen this novel midfield system in place.

Arsenal's midfield setup vs West Ham: Denilson (yellow) held, Fabregas (blue) attacked and Song (green) alternated in between. It should be noted though that Denilson was subbed off after 67 mins, after which Arsenal set up camp in the final 3rd. The average positions of Fabregas and Song may therefore appear to be higher up than they actually were while all 3 players were on the pitch together.

With Denilson holding the midfield and Fabregas supporting Chamakh in attack, Song was free to roam in between and contribute to both defence and attack. Much like Yaya Toure, Song is a player valued for his physical and defensive qualities but with the technical ability and intelligence to play higher up the pitch in a more direct and creative role. Potentially he's the best box-to-box player in the squad given his all-round abilities, intelligence and discipline (although Wilshere has also impressed so far this season), but the problem for Arsenal is that he's also by far the best holder. The question is which is better - Song holding/Denilson passing or Denilson holding/Song box-to-box? Wenger has opted for the latter in the last few games they've played together. Song brings added dynamism to the attack compared to Denilson, but at the same time still gets back to form a double defensive shield when the opposition have the ball in Arsenal's own half, so his re-deployment further forward may not necessarily weaken the defence.







Although each of the midfield trio had individual roles, there was considerable interchange with all 3 being comfortable playing deep or closer to the opposition box (Denilson less so). This seems to be a conscious decision by Arsene Wenger in an attempt to find new ways of breaking down the dreaded "parked bus" which has often been the scourge of this possession-based Arsenal side. With players moving out of their natural zones, they can lose their markers, draw players away from team-mates, and arrive un-noticed in dangerous areas. In particular, if the deepest midfielder - who often has no specific marker - is given the license to get into the opposition box, then that adds a whole new attacking dimension to this Arsenal side.

Of course this requires discipline and understanding between the midfielders in order not to leave the defence uncovered, this was painfully apparent against West Brom but on Saturday this didn't seem to be a problem.

As usual, some video evidence to summarise the key features of the new-look midfield:

Comments (17)

Loading... Logging you in...
  • Logged in as
good stuff man i don't know how you're able to see what you do
1 reply · active less than 1 minute ago
I just download the match and watch it again, Guardian chalkboards and ESPN soccernet also helps.
So is Arsenal truly a 4-3-3 team? Because on more than one occasion I've seen the 4-2-3-1 employed.
1 reply · active 751 weeks ago
It depends on Fabregas' position relative to the 2 wide forwards, if you look at the average position graph above you can see that in this match the front 3 of Arshavin, Chamakh, Nasri played on a similar plane with Fabregas behind. So I'd say 4-3-3. But to be honest Fabregas is so attacking and gets forward so often that it's very difficult to argue he's not a par of the forward line.

4-2-3-1 would be a more accurate reflection of the formation ever since Wenger pushed Fabregas up into a more attacking role around this time last season.
aravindvr's avatar

aravindvr · 751 weeks ago

awesome Video n analysis...
Keep up the gud work...a lesson to all Song bashers and the misery brigade,,,
In a fluid 3-man system - or, to put it another way, a system in which two CMs defend together (rather than having one "anchor" man) - is it at all necessary to have a tough-tackling, keep-it-simple defensive midfielder?

Is the future not more about combining players who can play deep AND further forward? For example Khedira and Alonso.

And if so, could we see a midfield three of Lansbury-Wilshere-Ramsey in the near future? All three can tackle, pass sensibly (keeping possession), pass dangerously (ie. through-balls), AND score goals. One of them can also dribble very well (Wilshere), reminding me of Iniesta - although (without wanting to succumb to hype), Wilshere's possibly better from deep than Iniesta (yes, really, there - I said it).
1 reply · active 751 weeks ago
I think it would take incredible discipline and years of playing together if we were ever to see a genuinely fluid 3 man midfield. I don't think I've ever come across any such examples in footballing history. At the most we can hope for a box-to-box defensive duo (which Wenger seems to be working on this season with Wilshere and Song) with someone stationed more permanently further ahead.
Arsenal Station's avatar

Arsenal Station · 751 weeks ago

This video is just a good example of the way Arsenal's midfield have always approached their passing game under Wenger. Arsenal's passing IN midfield has always been based on triangles since even before the 2001-2005 side. Great video, TBG. Keep up the good work!
Great video sir, u demonstrated the points made very well. Looking forward to more such articles.
midfield general's avatar

midfield general · 751 weeks ago

that's excellent... thank you
Excellent work.

Looking at the other players on the average position chart, I noticed that Arsh is right on top of Cham. I know Cham moves quite a bit, but do you think it is a concern with Arsh being so inward with his lazy tendencies? I wonder how his movement and average position compares to when he first came to the Arsenal?
2 replies · active 751 weeks ago
Domhuaille's avatar

Domhuaille · 751 weeks ago

Good point Jib as the pocket rocket Russian hates to move more than absolutely necessary, however him being close to Chamakh is more illusion since ,as you noticed,Chamakh is all over the field in an attacking,holding and defensive orgy of work (certainly NOT Arshavin's style)based on the need and this allows Arshavin to find him, after drawing defenders away from Maroune. It is still a triangular tactic as Cesc, Song or Nasri can support this type of play. Where it becomes a real worry is when the opponents counter-attack and Arshavin sits down to scratch his ass while everyone else tracks back or doesn't as the case may be. his creates a wide and long gap between the midfield and the strikers.
Yes you're quite right, Chamakh (as usual) and Arshavin both wandered around the attacking 3rd quite a lot, Chamakh to the left particularly and Arshavin to the centre. So the average position gives the impression they were playing right next to each other when in fact they were probably just switching positions.
great vid explaining the "double pivot"
This is an excellent piece, I really enjoyed the video. I wrote a similar article myself on the liberation of Alex Song in Arsenal's midfield.
http://www.americantreble.com/2010/11/alex-song-a...
1 reply · active 750 weeks ago
Thanks.

I disagree in your piece about Arsenal switching from a double to single pivot this season. Last season Song anchored mostly by himself, but then at the start of this season we saw a new system with Song and Wilshere forming a double screen in front of the back 4 when defending (Wilshere pushing on when attacking). However in the last couple of games the defensive double pivot seems to have been replaced with a single holding midfielder and Song as a more full-time box to box player.

But other than that agree with the rest of the points you made.
I kinda really want this to be good, but at the same time I don't want to see it even if it is.

He was my favorite author growing up, and he touted he kept refusing hollywood scripts because they tried to cast the kids as teenagers. Well, he accepted one, and they cast the kids as teenagers.

Post a new comment

Comments by