Tuesday, 28 December 2010

Arsenal 3-1 Chelsea - Wenger gets his tactics spot on

After 13 failed attempts, Arsenal have finally beaten a Chelsea side containing Didier Drogba. Arsene Wenger spoke about the threat posed by the Ivorian before the game, and refreshingly his team selection was geared as much towards nullifying Chelsea as it was towards aiding Arsenal's passing game.

Wenger had several big selection decisions to make and he got all of them spot on:
-Johan Djourou came in for Sebastian Squillaci, adding more physical and aerial presence against Drogba
-A fully-fit Robin van Persie was preferred to Marouane Chamakh and resumed his role as a false 9
-Theo Walcott started on the right to reduce Ashley Cole's influence and provide a threat in behind Chelsea's defence
-Samir Nasri's work rate and economy in possession was preferred on the left with the more lackadaisical Andrey Arshavin dropped to the bench


Arsenal's 4-2-3-1: Song (17) and Wilshere (19) sat behind the front four, covering the right and left flanks respectively.
Van Persie (hidden behind 2) played his usual false 9 role, dropping back into midfield & creating space for Fabregas (4) and Walcott (14) to advance into the box. Koscielny (6) brought the ball out of defence while Djourou (20) stayed back.

In the same fixture last year, Ashley Cole set up two goals from left wing crosses and repeated the feat again at Stamford Bridge this season when he set up Didier Drogba for the opener. In both games Nasri started ahead of Walcott on the right, and the latter goal arose as a direct result of Nasri failing to track Cole's run down the left. Walcott played in the return fixture at Stamford Bridge last season and managed to keep Cole reasonably quiet, so perhaps Wenger had this in mind when deciding to start the young Englishman on the right.

In theory it makes a lot of sense, Walcott has tremendous pace and his diagonal running in behind opposition defences is a major threat - one which requires left backs to play more conservatively. This was the case in the game last night, with Cole barely venturing into the final 3rd of the pitch. Not only did Walcott pin back Cole for the majority of the time he was on the pitch, he also displayed excellent defensive awareness in tracking the runs of the left back (and of Malouda) on the few occasions that space did develop on Chelsea's left side - as this following video shows:



Ashley Cole's passing chalkboard: In the 73 minutes that Walcott was on the pitch, Ashley Cole managed just one (unsuccessful) pass in the attacking 3rd.

Walcott will have got a lot of plaudits for his role in Arsenal's 2nd and 3rd goals but his defensive work was equally excellent. With Cole/Malouda on the left and Ferreira/Kalou on the right, it's clear which side was Chelsea's strongest, and indeed there was a clear passing bias to the left throughout the match.  Walcott's defensive diligence - along with Bakary Sagna and Alex Song's excellent performances - helped to shut down Chelsea's entire left flank.

Arsenal's right-sided dominance: Alex Song (6/6) and Bakary Sagna (5/5)
completed all of their attempted tackles.

Chelsea's left flank shut down: Despite showing a clear preference for passing to the left flank, Chelsea were unable to penetrate into the final 3rd on that side - amazingly not a single pass was played from that zone. They had better luck down the right against the defensively-weaker trio of Clichy-Wilshere-Nasri, but Kalou and Ferreira lacked the ability to take advantage, and their teammates didn't seem to have much faith in them.

Not only did Arsenal defend well in their own half, they also pressed well in Chelsea's. Up until the 3rd goal, Chelsea's keeper and centre backs were put under constant pressure by the closing down of van Persie and Fabregas (and occasionally the 2 wider players), with the fullbacks and deeper midfielders pushing up to close down the gaps in behind. This was a much more co-ordinated form of pressing than has been seen in recent weeks from this Arsenal side, and it paid dividends. Chelsea were unable to build from the back and resorted to numerous long balls forward, which the Arsenal back 4 dealt with fairly comfortably. In addition, Arsenal were able to win back possession several times inside Chelsea's own half, the most prominent example being Walcott's robbing of Malouda in the build-up to Arsenal's 3rd goal.


While the defending was excellent, there was still the small matter of breaking through Chelsea's deep-lying defence. It's been a problem area for Arsenal in recent encounters between the two sides, with Chelsea keeping clean sheets in each of the previous 3 games. But this time it was to be different. In an attempt to break down stubborn defences, Wenger has given Alex Song more license to get forward this season (facilitated by a change in the midfield set-up from a 1-2 to more of a 2-1). The decision paid off against West Ham, and it did again yesterday as the Cameroonian started off an attack from deep, driving into the box before calmly shooting into the far left corner of the net.

In fact, Wenger will have been delighted with all 3 goals yesterday because they were a perfect demonstration of his attacking philosophy, and of the capabilities of Arsenal's 4-2-3-1/4-3-3 formation:


Overall, a very positive performance for the Gunners. Not only does it keep them in touch with the league leaders, it also provides a tactical blueprint with which to approach future big games. One of my main criticisms of Wenger has been that, while he may be an expert technician, he is not necessarily an expert tactician. On last night's evidence I am beginning to believe he may also be the latter.

Comments (25)

Loading... Logging you in...
  • Logged in as
great text, congratulations ;)
Footballistico's avatar

Footballistico · 743 weeks ago

Excellent and comprenhensive analysis. You just forget one point : Arsenal excellent pressing is just one part of the story: Chelsea midfield was completely disorganised in the second half due to Obi Mikel substitution by Ramires. In the second goal, this is Essien (the new holding midfielder) who gives the ball to Walcott. In the third, Malouda goes deep to create link-up play (nominally Mikel's role) before being pressed by Walcott.

However, great match from Arsenal. Even Pep Guardiola should take note.

Footballistico (a football blog -in french- sorry).
1 reply · active less than 1 minute ago
Yes you're right. The defining moment of the match though was the 1st goal, which came just before half time. The 2nd half substitutions/errors all came as a result of Arsenal being able to score 1st, which was the major difference from previous games between the 2 sides.

The pattern of the play in the 2nd half was different and I didn't go into much detail. For instance the team dropped off slightly, Song took on more responsibilty for helping out Sagna etc.

Google translate does a fairly good job on your blog :p
I believe Wenger is an expert tactician, he just hasn't shown it recently because he's been stubbornly trying to press his possession-based attacking philosophy much too hard. The fact that he dropped Arshavin for this match proves that he knew full well that the Russian, as attack-minded and capable of the beautiful football Wenger so craves he is, was a liability and he had to make that choice because had Arshavin played, this system would not have worked and we probably would have ended up with a result similar to last season's or earlier this season.

Well played Boss, and well played Arsenal! :D
1 reply · active 743 weeks ago
I got to disagree.. Wenger knows tactics well.. there are 2 types of manager or 2 type of chess players. One who study the opponent and counter their style of play (SAF and many managers in the weaker team). The second type of manager are the type would be to be master of their own style of playing and drags the opponent to play their type of game (Wenger, Pep).. There is actually a third type, a balance of the 2 (Jose)

This is no longer tactical level, but it is now a strategy level.

Its hard to say which style is better. There are times certain style prevails the other type..

Wenger do change tactics very often, but he does so at the individual level.
it came down to chelsea's defence ball watching. first goal, fair enough it was jack wilsheres sexy reverse pass that made it possible. However Walcott and Cesc' goals both came from similar incidents, Van Persie coming deep but rather than one centre back tracking him, Terry like the deluded spastic he is when it comes to strikers movements decided to track him too, leading to a massive gaping whole at the back, which was widened even further by Chelsea's full backs not being narrow enough that lead to 2 similar goals.

The best way to defend against Arsenal is to be narrow and whilst Chelsea did that during the first half, they left massive gaps between players which lead to clusterfuck of players in the middle and Arsenal broke in that gap between centre back and left back. Twice. Terry guilty of ball watching, just like he was when Germany hammered us in the World Cup.

Also Chelsea were lacklustre coming forward, yes Jack and Song were great in closing down and pressing but when Chelsea DID have space they did not do anything. Thing is, Chelsea are not a team based on panache, they are based on power... be it the power of Drogba, the power of Lampards shots and the power of Malouda;s running. They have never been a side of guile like Arsenal or United and the reason for Chelsea's slump is that their physicality is now being matched due to their key players now reaching their 30's. Note how when Chelsea were in on goal, they never had enough guile to score and ended up having wayward efforts.

Lastly, Renoog go watch Chelsea's next opponents in the Champions League Copenhagen. A side as physical as Stoke and a side that also presses very intensively (drew with Barcelona and narrowly lost if I can remember correctly) and that side might with a bit of luck eliminate Chelsea. Especially as Chelsea are not that physical anymore and their technique has never been great.
1 reply · active less than 1 minute ago
Sure, the last 2 goals were down to defensive errors, but those errors were made possible by the fact that Arsenal were a goal ahead and Chelsea had to chase the game. That's a luxury that Arsenal have not been able to enjoy in recent games against Chelsea, and it's because they've been unable to pass through Chelsea's deep, narrow defence. Wenger gave Song a more attacking role this season specifically because of that inability to break through such stubborn defences, and it paid off.

I think Chelsea will have had some key players back from injury by then (particularly Lampard - granted he played in this game but was just back from injury - and Benayoun who provide the creativity that they've been lacking), and if not they can always go out and spend a few quid in the transfer market.
Hey Mr Rangoon, I just miss your post match Analysis of Arsenal games.. pls do more of it, this is my fav Gunner blog.. there is just so much that many peeps don't see as many things do happen off the ball..

Great Great post!!
2 replies · active less than 1 minute ago
Totally agree with this. I love checking out ZM and this blog for some interesting tactical discussions. Love the videos too, great job with those.
Thanks, not sure how you managed to spell Renoog as Rangoon though :p
Mr Renoog, your tactical reports are better than ZM's IMO. You should honestly do them more often if you can.
1 reply · active less than 1 minute ago
Thanks, I think ZM is better at being able to analyse a game in real-time though, usually I have to watch the match again before I can write about it. ZM has his match reports up an hour or two after a game finishes which is very impressive.

I have been busy recently and haven't been able to watch as many live Arsenal games, let alone watch them a second time, I can't promise that I will be making them as regularly from now on but when there's a free weekend I'll try my best. Cheers.
Excellent analysis and the best part as rightly pointed out is the way we played when we dint have the possession. It wasnt one of either cesc or jack's best game but the way they tracked back when they lost possession was an eye opener. Cesc had said about big match temperament but if this game was anything to go by, we are on the right track. Chelsea dint have one of their better games but we in a large way contributed towards making it one of their worst ever. This victory will be worth even more if we round it up with a win against Wigan tonite.
1 reply · active 743 weeks ago
Yes, one thing I forgot to mention in the article was that the Chelsea result put a stop to this terrible habit of losing 2 games on the bounce, let's hope the players don't descend into their other habit of becoming complacent after important victories.
Btw, Mr Renoog could you pls do a video explaining Song's forward runs? there are just too many nutheads online who dosn't understood the strength he gave when he is in the box~~

Again, love your videos, it helps me understand the game so much to allow me to talk crap like a pro :p
1 reply · active less than 1 minute ago
I did a little analysis of Song's role in the attacking 3rd after the West Ham game (video at the end): http://mr-renoog-videos.blogspot.com/2010/11/arse...

The Arsenal Column also does a great job of analysing Song's new role:
http://arsenalcolumn.co.uk/?p=7609
http://arsenalcolumn.co.uk/?p=7243

Thanks but I'm no different, I just copy others' opinions and add fancy videos to make them seem original :p
great article ! continue to make more ! though i will be too sad to sleep for the next few days!!
I think chelsea miss franks influence and drive . they also missed his goals as he is a genius in running into the box and his timing is perfect and thats when he scores a lot of goals from there. sadly, lampard did not perform like his old self. however, i like his one touch pass to drogba in the 7th minute. he anticipated the pass and sent it through. I also like his slide tackle that blocked the shot from,(i forgot who!), in the 80th min. He followed the players move into the box. it was great covering for the two centre backs who were occupied by the forwards. sadly only
i am a coach from Greece and i find your blog very good for soccer match analysis.recently i was in KNVB at zeist and we were doing there match analysis lessons.I must tell you, you have make a complete match analysis of the game.I want to make you one question.You are a coach or soccer analyst or you have study match analysis or for your hobby...?
1 reply · active less than 1 minute ago
No I don't do this as a job at all (I wish I did!). It's just something I do for fun, if I had the chance to enter coaching I'd jump at it. Unlikely though.
@iamozgooner's avatar

@iamozgooner · 743 weeks ago

Great info, thanks. The 1 point that comes up frequently is Kos's ability to bring the ball out of defence and make a telling or safe pass, he more often than not (prove me wrong with stats maybe) makes a hash of it. T.V can do it, Kos & Squilly cannot, J.D is in between. I would like to see Arsenal buy a CB with this quality and also have the airial ability to defend crosses (6' 2+). Good blog added to my fav list.
1 reply · active less than 1 minute ago
Technically I think he's a good ball player and a good passer but maybe he takes too many risks with his forward passes.
Great work! What I like about this analysis is that there is not alot of writing. You let the videos do most of the explaining, which makes things more enjoyable and coherent.
Great analysis, In-depth and thoughtful. Even better than ZonalMarking's

Bookmarked :)
goodevening MR renoog.where are you from?I am from Greece and i'm very surprised with your work (match analysis).

greeting from GREECE
Happy new year!!
thanos

Post a new comment

Comments by