Wednesday, 2 March 2011

Who should start as centre forward in Van Persie's absence?



Source: Press Association Images
So once again Robin van Persie is out injured at a crucial period during Arsenal's season. His absence means that progression through to the Champions League quarter finals will be an uphill struggle, and in the FA Cup a daunting game at Old Trafford awaits the Gunners should they advance past Leyton Orient in their 5th round replay tonight. On the positive side he will only miss 2 Premier League games should his recovery go to plan, with Arsene Wenger estimating that the Dutchman will be out for at least 3 weeks.

Robin van Persie is of course a top class player, but his effect on Arsenal's system extends far beyond his own individual contributions. His appreciation for space, intelligence in his movement, and ability to retain and distribute the ball high up the pitch, all make him the ideal candidate to act as the "false 9" within Arsenal's attack. His presence brings the best out of the likes of Cesc Fabregas and Theo Walcott, players who thrive on the space that van Persie creates for them in behind defences.

Van Persie's injury last year saw Arsenal transform from free-scoring high-fliers to a team that ended up limping, trophyless, over the finishing line in May. It was clear that his injury disrupted the team's attacking flow, and although Wenger experimented with several different players in the centre forward roles (Bendtner, Eduardo, and more radically Arshavin), none of them were able to replicate the influence of the Dutchman.

With Wenger looking unlikely to stray from his 4-2-3-1 setup this season, it's important that whoever fills in for van Persie is as similar as possible in terms of style of play. Step forward Marouane Chamakh. The Morroccan was signed on a free from Bordeaux last summer, and although he's struggled for form since December (not surprising given his lack of starts since the return of van Persie), his performances in the first few months of the season were excellent. Although lacking the creative talent and individual goalscoring game of van Persie, Chamakh was an effective deputy because vitally, he was able to replicate the intelligent movement and the hold-up play of the Dutchman, which is so vital in dragging markers out of position and facilitating the other attacking players in breaking into space.

The following table shows the overall team's attacking performance as well as individual goals/assists stats of the players who have started as centre forward since Arsenal switched to a 4-3-3/4-2-3-1 at the start of last season*. Realistically Arshavin will not be playing in the middle again this season, but his stats are shown for reference.


(*Only Premier League and Champions League proper games have been included, as other competitions tend to include weakened teams. Further breakdown of home/away performances as well as game-by-game stats are available by clicking on the other tabs at the bottom.)




What's evident is that the team scores at an amazing rate with van Persie as starting centre forward (obviously), but despite appearing to be individually the weakest of the club's 3 centre forwards, Chamakh does a much better job than Bendtner in preserving the attacking flow and goal average. The Morroccan lacks movement into goalscoring positions, directness, and killer instinct, but he more than makes up for it with his teamplay and overall positive effect on the team's ability to ripple the back of the net.

Source: Getty Images
I have speculated previously on the reason behind Bendtner's apparent negative effect on team performance despite seeming to do well on an individual level. I believe that the role of the centre forward in Arsenal's 4-2-3-1 should first and foremost be to aid the flow of the attack and to create space for the 3/4 players behind him. The individual goalscoring/assists performance of the centre forward comes secondary to the team's overall attacking performance. In that respect, van Persie and Chamakh do a far better job than Bendtner, who seems to stifle the team's fluidity with his (relatively) poor touch and movement. This trend is evidenced by the superior team performances when the centre forward role was occupied last season by Andrei Arshavin. The Russian, a natural attacking midfielder, contributed next to nothing in terms of goals/assists but enabled the team to score at an average of 2 goals per game, highlighting the importance of having a player who can drift about, take passes in his stride and keep the ball moving within the final 3rd.

One of the arguments in favour of Bendtner is that he very often pops up with vital goals and assists (this was particularly true from February onwards last season). However, you could say that Bendtner's ability to provide important match-saving contributions is a self-fulfilling prophecy. By making the system less geared towards fluidity and interchanging of positions, and more geared towards serving an orthodox no.9 (relative to other Arsenal centre forwards), the team's goal output is decreased, but the likelihood of Bendtner being the one to score or assist increases. And therefore he appears to be bailing Arsenal out, when in fact his presence was probably the root cause of Arsenal struggling in the first place.

In fact, the only game where Arsenal have scored more than 3 team goals with Bendtner as starting centre forward, was the 5-0 win over Porto. Bendtner was surprisingly clinical that game, netting a hattrick from 2 predatory finishes and a penalty. A system with Nicklas Bendtner as the single centre forward would only work in the long term if he could improve his finishing. In a more orthodox attacking system, less chances are created, and it therefore becomes vital that the focal point inside the box (i.e. Bendtner) makes the most of the chances that come his way. Unfortunately this has rarely been the case in the past.

Conclusion:

Unless Wenger switches to a 4-4-2 or another formation that facilitates 2 centre forwards, Marouane Chamakh remains the ideal candidate to take over van Persie's false 9 role. The Morroccan was given his chance at the start of the year and proved that he was able to fill the void that would otherwise have cost Arsenal a chance at the title, as it did the previous season. Nicklas Bendtner remains a decent plan B, but Chamakh's qualities are more in tune in with Arsenal's plan A.

Comments (17)

Loading... Logging you in...
  • Logged in as
how bloody old is this update your stats on Arshavin dolt!
^^ The stats are of Arshavin playing as a centre forward.

"In fact, the only game where Arsenal have scored more than 3 team goals with Bendtner as starting centre forward, was the 5-0 win over Porto. Bendtner was surprisingly clinical that game, netting a hattrick from 2 predatory finishes and a penalty."

Did anybody say deja vu??

On first half season performance it would surely be Chamakh, but both players have had quite incredible reversals in their form. Chamakh seems like a shadow of himself, and while Id love to have the patience for him to find his step again, at this end of the season there just isn't enough room for poor performances.
Meanwhile, Bendtner has demonstraed that perhaps he isn't totally mental for thinking he's one of the best strikers in the world. Sure his first touch may not be the greatest, but hes clearly ahead of Chamakh in several aspects of his game.

The most frustrating facet of Chamakh's game has been his inhibition to shoot for goal. Sure he brings other players into the game, but van Persie's recent performances demonstrated how important it is to have a player at the top of the bitch who is willing and capable of finishing from tight spaces and close as well as long range. While no RvP, Bendtner has shown over the passt few games that he can score some crackers every now and again.

Bendtner's confidence in dribbling is also on the up, while Chamakh seems stiffer and more constricted. In the air I think both players are on par.

It would be great to have th old Chamkh back, but on current form I think it's going to have to be Nic.
1 reply · active less than 1 minute ago
Yes a lot of uncanny similarities with the Porto hattrick! But the first 2 goals against Orient were real quality individual efforts, and Chamakh was the centre forward rather than Bendtner. But that's beside the point...
I think Chamakh's movement could be key in the Barca game. Neither players have brililant first touches, and despite Bendtner's hat-trick last night, neither are in top-form. For me, Bendtner was a useful outlet at the Nou Camp last year, but it isn't exactly ideal when Barca are going to be keeping the ball for 20 minutes at a time..

On the one hand, it's perhaps good to have someone who can be there to finish off moves if and when we get them on the counter attack, and so I suppose this would be Bendtner on current form (better than Chamakh at least) and the role BG has described him as playing....
2 replies · active 734 weeks ago
...On the other.. It's arguably more useful to have a player who can drop deep, play it simple and give space (& more freedom) to Arshavin and Nasri (and/or whoever plays on the right hand side) as well as help put pressure on Barca's midfield and remain a threat in the air (if, one day, we decide that crossing isn't all that bad against Barcelona). If we want this, surely Chamakh is ideal...

Really interesting article though, BackwardsGooner. Rightly or wrongly, I expect Super Nick will get the nod unless Chamakh does something spectacular between now and Tuesday next week...

Although Chamakh has been preferred in Champions League games this season & I think the absence of Walcott (and obviously Cesc) may play a bigger part if we don't come through the other side.
Yes the game at the Camp Nou demands a different strategy because we'll be on the backfoot and therefore playing a roaming centre forward may not be what's required. However I do think that Chamakh holds the ball up much better, which will be vital in relieving pressure on the defence (something which Bendtner failed to do in either leg last year, particularly at the Emirates). Furthermore Chamakh is slightly faster and could draw a penalty/red card/dangerous freekick with one of those runs off the shoulder of the last man on the counter, as he was consistently doing at the start of the season. You say neither has brilliant first touches but I think the difference is that Chamakh's touch is at least consistently tidy, while Bendtner seems to suffer from clumsy-big-man-syndrome more often, whether it's being put through behind the defence or receiving the ball with his back to goal.
Excellent article, and certainly didn't notice the differences in movement between Chamakh and Bendtner, and Chamakh being closer to a false nine. A huge problem with Bendtner as the front man is his bad first touch and ball control, plus sloppy passing. (More difficult to control the ball when you are that tall.) He keeps losing the ball cheaply, while Chamakh doesn't. I was thinking Nasri might work well as a false nine, actually, although he might need a few games to get the movement right. (A thought inspired by Messi.) To me he actually seems better on the right wing than the left wing, because he has better movement there (more experience in that position).
1 reply · active less than 1 minute ago
That's an interesting point about Nasri, it's a radical suggestion but then Arshavin played as the false 9 last season too. My opinion is that the false 9 role is best occupied by a player who's naturally a creative support-striker. Someone like van Persie, or Messi, or Tevez (maybe this is why Wenger experimented with Arshavin). Because their natural game already fits in with the technical and movement requirements of the false 9 role. Based on that I don't think Nasri is yet ready for a false 9 role, but it's an interesting suggestion.
I think Bendtner is kept on the side because he makes a plan B possible. Ideally, a striker with the combination of Chamakh and Benny would be the best choice. With Bendtner we can use our width much better because the wide players don't have to come inside to make that pass, a good cross would do. I can also say that we don't cross enough otherwise and hence when we play Bendtner as our lone striker, he cannot score till late in the game. As much as Bendtner needs to tune in so does the rest of the team.

ALso, Bendtner is much much better in the box now than Chamakh. Chamakh plays too much of a false nine and refuses to take on defenders like Bendtner does. In summary, Bendtner needs to get more clinical and learn the false-nine better and Chamakh needs to get his shooting boots on.
you''re back ! dreat article anyway. I have not been watching arsenal this season so i am not in any position to make any comments.
1 reply · active less than 1 minute ago
Thanks, it's nice to be back :)
dean smith's avatar

dean smith · 733 weeks ago

u should play when fabregas is not in the team , that is very interesting topic , can u speak on that please, cos that been a issue recently
1 reply · active 733 weeks ago
I'm not going to write a post on it but my opinion is that Ramsey should be first backup to Fabregas, if he's not available then Rosicky.
At this point, with his repeated injury absences, an equally important question is who fills in for Cesc? If Wenger opts for Rosicky in that role in the FA Cup, I'll scream in frustration. I'm not sure why he hasn't, but Nasri seems to be the obvious option. As shown in the Sunderland game, Wilshere is both too important in a deeper role and is perhaps not quite ready yet. I'd love to try Aaron Ramsey there with Wilshere and Diaby (Song's still out) deeper, but I'm just not sure of his comeback status.
1 reply · active less than 1 minute ago
I'm not sure Nasri has the vision for that role, he offers a good goalthreat and can dribble well, but I think he lacks the speed and penetration of passing that's required. Of course no-one can replace Fabregas' qualities, but I think Rosicky does a good job of adding tempo and one-touch passing to the role, which helps to compensate somewhat for Fabregas's absence. Nasri has a tendency to hold onto the ball too long as an attacking midfielder, and lacks the quick-mindedness to spot gaps in the backline and play penetrating forward passes.

Personally I think Nasri if much-needed on the right, particularly with Walcott out. I would hate to see Wenger treat this as a "B" game and start Bendtner on the right.

In the long-term, I think Ramsey is Fabregas' backup and eventual replacement. I would start him in this game, he's played enough games for Cadiff to have regained his fitness and he looks just as sharp and confident as he always was (granted against Championship opposition). If Wenger though does decide it's too early, I'd be OK with Rosicky starting in that role.
RVP>Chamakh>Szczesny>Bendtner
Yes a lot of uncanny similarities with the Porto hattrick! But the first 2 goals against Orient were real quality individual efforts, and Chamakh was the centre forward rather than Bendtner.

Post a new comment

Comments by